Cases 11 - 20 of 198
Adams v. F.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
F.D.O.C., Florida State Prison Administration, G. Bennott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almond v. Flagler County Inmate Facility et al
as 3:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Michael Almond, Jr.
Defendant:
Flagler County Inmate Facility, Rick Staly, Officer/Deputy Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
LEEOTIS BAILEY
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
C. Bailey, Donald Davis and Mark Inch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Tabb et al
as 5:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bass
Defendant:
FNU Tabb and FNU Feliciano-Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Drake v. Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 8:2022cv02673
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Drake, Jr., Yeremiyah Israel and Ulysses Drake Jr. Corp.
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, Pinellas County Jail, Clearwater Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 3:2022cv22015
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BAILEY
Defendant:
L RODRIGUEZ, BURDETT, AGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Longino et al v. Masters et al
as 2:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Samuel Longino and Willis Bailey
Defendant:
Melinda Masters, Jon Carner, Dr. Courtney Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. DIXON
as 5:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
JOHN BAILEY
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. PISTRO
as 5:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
CHARLES BAILEY
Respondent:
K PISTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
