Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Mendez v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv04539
Petitioner:
Franco Teza Mendez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lucas Franco v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv10102
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jose Martin Lucas Franco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv24675
Defendant:
United States Secretary of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Miami Field Office Director, Assistant Field Office Director and others
Plaintiff:
Raudel Franco Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bermudez-Franco v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv23076
Plaintiff:
Maria V. Bermudez-Franco
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Franco Padgett v. USA
as 17-12645
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCO NICHOLAS PADGETT
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Teal vs. Scott et al.
as 8:2017cv01229
Plaintiff:
Daniel K Teal
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Heather Robinson, Julie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franco v. United States of America
as 8:2017cv01182
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jonathan Quijij Franco
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Betancourt v. Osceola County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00716
Plaintiff:
Edil C. Betancourt
Defendant:
Osceola County Dept. of Corrections, Director of Dept. of Corrections , Osceola City Medical Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY v. JONES et al.
as 3:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WADE TERRY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, J COKER, BOOKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franco Padgett v. USA
as 17-11158
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCO NICHOLAS PADGETT
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
