Cases 11 - 20 of 3,964
Ballester, John v. Centurion Health Care Provider
as 1:2024cv23320
Defendant:
Centurion Health Care Provider
Plaintiff:
John W. Ballester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham, John v. Matos et al
as 9:2024cv81047
Defendant:
Dr Hipolito Matos and The GEO Group Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Farron Latham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Heaven v. Judge Cotton et al
as 5:2024cv00453
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1-3 and Judge Cotton
Plaintiff:
Jerome Heaven, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OCAMPO-VERGARA v. GABBY
as 5:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
SALVADOR OCAMPO-VERGARA
Respondent:
JOHN GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Defendant:
J NEEL, ENGLE, C CARRIER and others
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOSEPH v. DIXON et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Defendant:
TIMMIE ROBINSON, RICKY DIXON and JOHN DUMAS
Plaintiff:
YAHZUR A YOSEPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00401
Defendant:
FNU Ivery, J. Winton, B. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TLUSTY v. ALEXANDER et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Defendant:
J ELLENBURG, JOHN AND JANE DOE, ALEXANDER and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JEFFREY TLUSTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. KAISER et al
as 3:2024cv00359
Defendant:
DEFUNIAK SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES W HURLEY, JR, ANTHONY KAISER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WAYNE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01420
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
