Cases 11 - 20 of 351
Lawson v. Warden FCC Coleman
as 5:2023cv00723
Petitioner:
Willie Lawson
Respondent:
Warden FCC Coleman and Warden FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Comley v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00960
Plaintiff:
Derek Comley
Defendant:
Deputy Lawson, Judge Burns and Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ANDERSON
Defendant:
K LAWSON, J PERDUE and C WOODLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Jones v. Telfair SP Warden, et al
as 23-13459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN LAWSON JONES, a.k.a. Vizion
Defendant / Appellee:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN VERONICA STEWART, DEPUTY WARDEN MARCUS and others
Kenel Joseph v. K. Williams, et al
as 23-13237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENEL JOSEPH
Defendant / Appellee:
K. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, M. NEAL and others
NORDQUIST v. LAWSON et al
as 4:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
ERIC JOSEPH NORDQUIST
Defendant:
DR VICTORIA LAWSON and DR RASHIK PATEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KERCH v. MIMS et al
as 5:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP N KERCH
Defendant:
CHARLES MIMS, DEPUTY WARDEN TONYA ASHLEY, CAPTAIN MELISSA LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. USA
as 7:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
GERALD THERONE LAWSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lawson v. Montoya et al
as 2:2023cv14240
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Defendant:
E. Montoya, John Holtz, S. Martens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Joseph v. Williams
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Kenel Joseph
Defendant:
K. Williams, M. Neal, Derek Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
