Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Stokes v. Georgia State Prison et al
as 6:2021cv00021
Plaintiff:
Gerald Stokes
Defendant:
Mr. Figeruroa, Lt. Williams, Doctor Goul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. CRISP COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2020cv00195
Defendant:
CRISP COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, SGT MASTERS, SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK and others
Plaintiff:
JUWAN ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burt v. Doe et al
as 2:2019cv14347
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Officer/Sergeant Jane Doe, T.A Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Burt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Doe et al
as 1:2019cv21695
Plaintiff:
Craig E. Richardson
Defendant:
Nurse Jane Doe 2, Nurse Jane Doe, Deputy John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NESBITT v. LONG et al
as 5:2019cv00067
Defendant:
DOCTOR PETER WROBEL, DOCTOR ROWELL NANCY, NURSE JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL JAMES NESBITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Dr. Barnes et al
as 3:2018cv00484
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lavon Austin
Defendant:
Dr. Barnes, E. Valerio, G. Thompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnis v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv20575
Plaintiff:
Bobby Minnis
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections, Warden, John Does Numbers 1 through 9 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Sgt. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Jones, T. Twiggs, Lt. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00339
Plaintiff:
David Shannon Garrett
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Warden Riska, Asst. Warden Archey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adkison v. Kellett et al
as 1:2007cv01827
Plaintiff:
Robert Adkison, Jr.
Defendant:
Ralph Kellett, Jr, Sutherland, Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
