Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Phelps v. Toomey
as 3:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Judge Joel B. Toomey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorbey v. John Doe, et al
as 23-11850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a.k.a. Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, SIS, FNU VALISTERO, Psychology Supervisor, FNU MILLER, Case Manager Coordinator and others
William Phelps, Sr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-11713
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM LYNN PHELPS, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Phelps v. Dixon
as 3:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
John Doe, FNU Valistero, FNU Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phelps v. Kimbrell
as 3:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Kimbrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Oritz et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mack
Defendant:
FNU Oritz, FNU Bowers, U.D.C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Finley-Sanders v. Phelps
as 1:2023cv00995
Petitioner:
Leshunta Finley-Sanders
Respondent:
Shannon Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Phelps v. Inch et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Don Davis, G. Emanoilidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackmon v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00581
Petitioner:
Nathanael Blackmon and Nathaniel Blackmon
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisions, B. M. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
