Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Antron Smith v. Fairchild, et al
as 22-12875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTRON T. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
FAIRCHILD, C.O., in their individual and official capacities, TIMOTHY C. WARD, Commissioner of the State of Georgia. Department of Corrections; in their individual and official capacities, SPRADLY, Lt., in their individual and official capacities and others
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Saffo et al
as 1:2022cv20391
Plaintiff:
William Walter Chaney
Defendant:
Saffo, Roach, Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States District Court et al
as 5:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Antron T. Smith
Defendant:
United States District Court, Fairchild, Timothy C. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Boyer et al
as 1:2021cv02418
Plaintiff:
Earl Roach
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward and Wanda Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Coleman et al
as 5:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. Hammock, Officer Barkeley, Officer Spiers and others
Plaintiff:
James R. English, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Williams
as 1:2020cv04907
Defendant:
Veronica Williams
Plaintiff:
Earl Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. SISK et al
as 4:2020cv00256
Defendant:
Ronald Roach, Captain Bryan Huckabee, CHRIS COOKE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY PARKER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Henry County Jail
as 1:2020cv03367
Defendant:
Henry County Jail
Plaintiff:
Adam A. Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv22856
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
