Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Torres v. Caincioso et al
as 5:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Torres
Defendant:
Robert Caincioso , Evelyn Pizarro, F. Thorn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelley v. Whitfield County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2013cv00234
Plaintiff:
Todd Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
Whitfield County Sheriffs Office, Scott Chitwood, Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPherson v. Gee et al
as 8:2013cv01226
Plaintiff:
Ira Demetrius McPherson
Defendant:
David Gee, Colonel Davis and FNU Thorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Thorne v. Chairperson Fl Parole Comm., et al
as 10-15246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE THORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, TENA M. PATE, Parole Commissioner and MONICA DAVID, Parole Commissioner
SLY v. THORNE
as 5:2009cv00377
Plaintiff:
TERRY L SLY
Defendant:
PHILIP THORNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THORNE v. DUNPHY, et al
as 4:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
THOMAS EUGENE THORNE
Defendant:
FREDRICK B DUNPHY, TENA M PATE and MONICA DAVID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gordon v. Scott, et al.
as 5:2007cv00482
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
Steve Scott, FNU Thorn, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McKenzie v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2007cv00393
Plaintiff:
Cornell Augustus McKenzie
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tracy W. Johns, O. Barat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gordon v. Scott et al
as 5:2007cv00285
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
FNU Scott, FNU Thorn, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ibarra-Villalva v. USP Coleman Government Officials et al
as 5:2007cv00083
Plaintiff:
Felix Ibarra-Villalva
Defendant:
USP Coleman Government Officials, FNU Bengford, FNU Dole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
