Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Hammock v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Billy N. Hammock
Defendant:
Jackie Williams, Joyce Griener, Ann M. Vickery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Bishop et al
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Billy N. Hammock
Defendant:
FNU Bishop, Fox Clan, Jackie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMMOCK v. LEONARD et al
as 5:2012cv00501
Plaintiff:
BILLY N HAMMOCK
Defendant:
GREGORY J LEONARD, REEVES, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Billy N. Hammock
Defendant:
Peter D. Johnson, Fox Clan, Jackie (nmi) Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Jolly et al
as 1:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Billy Nelson Hammock
Defendant:
Sheryl B. Jolly, Peter D. Johnson, Ann M. Vickery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billy Hammock v. Ann Vickery, et al
as 12-10166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY N. HAMMOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
ANN M VICKERY, JOYCE GRIENER, Disability Rep, P. WILLIAMS and others
Hammock v. Vickery et al
as 4:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Billy N. Hammock
Defendant:
Ann M. Vickery, Joyce Griener, P Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickery v. Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services
as 2:2011cv00114
Petitioner:
Wylie M. Vickery
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vickery v. Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services
as 3:2011cv00220
Petitioner:
Wylie M. Vickery
Respondent:
Secretary of the Department of Children and Family Services and State Of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vickery v. USA
as 3:2010cv90083
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James W. Vickery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
