Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Truesdale v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2018cv22286
Plaintiff:
William James Truesdale
Defendant:
State of Florida, Defense Attorney, FDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford Reid v. Warden, et al
as 18-12168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON REID
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, Individual Capacity, Warden and ICT Member, FL. Dept of Corr Employee, J. A. PARRISH, Individual Capacity, Head of Classification and ICT Member, FL. Dept of Corr Employee, LAURIE L. OWENS and others
McGrady v. Thompson et al
as 3:2017cv00981
Plaintiff:
Christopher McGrady
Defendant:
S. Thompson, R. Brown, C. Wille Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rabonne v. U.S. Government et al
as 5:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
Paco T. Rabonne
Defendant:
U.S. Government, Charles Lockett, Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gavin v. West Plam Beach Police Department et al
as 9:2016cv81837
Plaintiff:
Authneil Gavin
Defendant:
West Plam Beach Police Department, Douglas Scott Bales, Gregory Rideau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Wills v. USA, et al
as 16-14095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COMMANEIRO, USP Coleman, Federal Correctional Officer
Wills v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wills
Defendant:
United States of America and Mr. Commaneiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larson v. Wills
as 2:2014cv01085
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Oliver Larson, Jr.
Defendant:
Harry Wills, William Stacy and Larry Rice
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Wills v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 13-12762
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLS
Respondent - Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Wills v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2013cv00002
Petitioner:
Christopher Wills
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
