Cases 21 - 30 of 1,373
Leon Bright v. City of Tampa, et al
as 24-11101
Plaintiff:
LEON BRIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF TAMPA, J. LAMBERT, CHRISTINA M. MITCHELL and others
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and SGT TELUR ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALSTON v. COASTAL STATE PRISON et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dennis Alston
Defendant:
Coastal State Prison, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballester v. State of Florida et al
as 5:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Ballester
Defendant:
State of Florida, U.S. Marshals Service, Lake County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01294
Petitioner:
Terrence Carruth
Respondent:
John or Jane Doe and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woullard v. Mason et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Woullard
Defendant:
M. Mason, Donald Davis, A. Gwara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DOE
as 4:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
JAMELL M COOPER
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Thomas v. Palm Beach County Sheriff, et al
as 24-10865
Plaintiff:
RODNEY THOMAS
Defendant:
PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF, MCINNIS, JEAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
