Cases 21 - 30 of 52
McCown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00415
Petitioner:
Jennie L. McCown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neal v. Dolce et al
as 1:2018cv20693
Plaintiff:
Mike E. Neal
Defendant:
V. Dolce, C. Auridien, A. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Washington et al
as 1:2018cv20440
Plaintiff:
Mike E. Neal
Defendant:
Rodney C. Washington, J. Mendez, D. Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Wilson et al
as 1:2018cv20374
Plaintiff:
Mike E. Neal
Defendant:
L. Wilson, D. Celeide, E. Cabarco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00052
Petitioner:
Jennie L. McCown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv00596
Petitioner:
Jennie L. McCown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randy Hart v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-15402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY A. HART
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JENNIE MORRIS and EDDIE MOSES
Hart v. Jones et al
as 5:2017cv00509
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones, Jennie Morris and Eddie Moses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEVELS v. JOHNES-RIVA et al
as 4:2017cv00476
Defendant:
THOMAS M KNIGHT, JENNY NIMER, KENNETH LEE HAWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
RAY DONOVAN NEVELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heulett v. Battle et al
as 5:2017cv01295
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyrone Heulett
Defendant:
Tommy Battle, Jennie Robinson, Joseph Tokar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
