Cases 21 - 30 of 2,027
Walleske v. Childs et al
as 8:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Clarence E. Walleske
Defendant:
Larry Childs, Ronterrious Williams, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merritt v. Mathewson et al
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Larry Bernard Merritt
Defendant:
John Doe Mathewson, John Doe Morales, John Doe Scarpatti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIVENS v. SZCZECINA
as 4:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
JEROME E BIVENS
Respondent:
M SZCZECINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Lonker et al
as 3:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Gerard E. Fry, Jr.
Defendant:
Whitney Lonker and Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Linder et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Daniels
Defendant:
D. Linder, John Robert Houston and E. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaston, Angel v. Palm Beach County et al
as 9:2024cv80497
Plaintiff:
Angel E Gaston
Defendant:
Rick Bradshaw, Sheriff Morris and Palm Beach County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovett v. Lewis et al
as 8:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Deon Lovett
Defendant:
Donald Roberts Lewis and Stephen E. Toner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. LEBLANC et al
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
PARIS DEMETRIUS EVANS
Defendant:
BOB LEBLANC, GARY E MOLEK, HEATHER DANIELLE PASTOOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. DEVORE-GUIFARRO et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Defendant:
BRACHER, E DEVORE-GUIFARRO, BODIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE VINCENT RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oscar v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Oscar
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
