Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Bright v. Hillsborough County et al
as 8:2019cv02347
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Popeye's Restaurant Employees FNU, Tampa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Hillsborough County et al
as 8:2019cv02274
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, CSA Chambers, FNU Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEATON v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00025
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, TARLOS THOMAS, TIMOTHY R NOLES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES KEATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salgado v. Goudling et al
as 6:2018cv01740
Plaintiff:
Darrius B. Salgado
Defendant:
John Doe (II), Chad Goudling, Michael Glatthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Nelson v. John Does, et al
as 18-12685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOES, State Legislators Employed at the Capitol, STATE ATTORNEY, 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF MIAMI DADE COUNTY, Circuit Court Judge's in their official capacity and others
BOWES v. JOHNS et al
as 3:2018cv01325
Plaintiff:
TAMARIUS JEROME BOWES
Defendant:
NICHOLAS JOHNS, MATTHEW PERRITT, TYLER DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEYMOUR v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
OMAR BERNARD SEYMOUR
Defendant:
MARY DAVIS, HUEL BROWN, VERNON BRONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv24178
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
Jones, Cash, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Forde v. Miami Federal Department of Co, et al
as 17-10448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN GERALD FORDE
Defendant - Appellee:
MIAMI FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE I, A.M. Shift Lieutenant, JOHN DOE II, A.M. Correctional Officer and others
Holland v. Perry et al
as 3:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Danny Holland
Defendant:
Perry, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
