Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Scott v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv00684
Petitioner:
Chester L. Scott
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv01842
Petitioner:
Francis L. Scott
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 3:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Scott
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and J. Santiago Riveria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00374
Petitioner:
Chester L. Scott
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Broward Prosecutor
as 0:2015cv60726
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Scott
Defendant:
Broward Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. McCarthy et al
as 0:2014cv61732
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Scott, III
Defendant:
Barbra McCarthy, The Broward County State Attorney's Office and The Florida Bar Association
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Golden et al
as 1:2014cv00308
Plaintiff:
Cedric L. Scott
Defendant:
Robert Golden and Jonathan Rabeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. ENGLISH
as 5:2014cv00117
Petitioner:
TERRY L SCOTT
Respondent:
N C ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WASHINGTON v CREWS, et al
as 4:2013cv00434
Petitioner:
GREGORY WASHINGTON
Respondent:
MICHAEL D CREWS and RICHARD L SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GORE v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
MARS L GORE
Defendant:
RICHARD L SCOTT, STATE OF FLORIDA, JOHN PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
