Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Haile et al v. Langford et al
as 6:2017cv01697
Plaintiff:
John Jay Haile, Sr., C. J. Haile, John Haile, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Sgt. Langford, Sgt. Sanford, Sgt. Q. Dorm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Najib Malik v. Dora Gaxiola, et al
as 17-13954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAJIB MALIK
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, D. GAXIOLA, OSCAR ORTEGA and others
Cazun v. Florida Attorney General et al
as 2:2017cv00293
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortega Cazun
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez-Ortega v. United States of America
as 8:2017cv00096
Plaintiff:
Lope Antonio Lopez-Ortega
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Scott v. Ortega et al
as 1:2016cv25168
Plaintiff:
Willie C. Scott
Defendant:
Oscar Ortega and Wexford Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Doe et al
as 5:2016cv00689
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Jane Doe, FNU Terralonge, Kimberly Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez-Ortega v. Johns et al
as 2:2016cv00154
Petitioner:
Lope A. Lopez-Ortega
Respondent:
Tracy Johns, Bureau of Prisons, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv24831
Plaintiff:
Juan Gonzalez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Medical Department, Everglades Correctional Institution, Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortega Cazun v. The Attorney General of the State of Florida et al
as 2:2016cv00595
Petitioner:
Marcus Ortega Cazun
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Florida and Secretary, DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Halloran et al
as 2:2016cv00589
Plaintiff:
Leslie Davis
Defendant:
Kevin C. Halloran, FNU Galamini, FNU Abia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
