Cases 21 - 30 of 4,071
Brinson v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Raheem T. Brinson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams, Lee A. v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv21879
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Williams
Defendant:
J. Lee, T. Anderson, Officer Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinner v. Reed et al
as 3:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
Bernard Reed, Mark Perkins, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland, Lamundrick v. Blizzard et al
as 6:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Lamundrick R Cleveland
Respondent:
Attorney Jason T Blizzard, Kathryn D. Weston and Asst State Attorney Amie M Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Tollick et al
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
S. Tollick, C. Wynn, J. McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland, Lamundrick v. Blizzard et al
as 1:2024cv21709
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R. Cleveland
Defendant:
Jason T. Blizzard, Kathryn D. Weston and Amie M. Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Santa Rosa C.I.
as 3:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Santa Rosa C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
