Cases 21 - 30 of 230
TOWNES v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
DARIAN TOWNES
Defendant:
HEATHER DAVIS, DON BLAKELY, TIMOTHY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORTHERN v. WARD et al
as 6:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Quincy Northern
Defendant:
Timothy Ward and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
NORTHERN v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
QUINCY NORTHERN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD and TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Jacobs
as 5:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Carl Edwards, III
Defendant:
Rick Jacobs, Judge Dywane Gillias, George Barnhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Perry v. Ward
as 4:2023cv00044
Petitioner:
Kyle Perry
Respondent:
Timothy Ward and Danforth
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Theapplius Goodman v. Brian Kemp, et al
as 23-10615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEAPPLIUS ANDRE GOODMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN KEMP, TIMOTHY WARD, GEORGIA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD and others
Edwards III v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Carl Edwards III
Defendant:
Warden Rick Jacobs, Judge Dywane Gillis, George Barnhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards III v. Jacobs et al
as 3:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Carl Edwards III
Defendant:
Warden Rick Jacobs, Judge Dywane Gillis, George Barnhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
