Cases 31 - 40 of 1,454
Turman v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01444
Plaintiff:
Senika Gomare Turman
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
ROY WAYNE JACKSON, JR
Defendant:
UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE, CMC PHARMACY and UNIVERSITY TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovett v. Lewis et al
as 8:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Deon Lovett
Defendant:
Donald Roberts Lewis, Stephen E. Toner, Unknown Female State Prosecutor /Assistant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez, Levon v. Unknown Police Chief et al
as 0:2024cv60664
Plaintiff:
Levon Lopez
Defendant:
Unknown Police Chief, Unknown Police Officer #1, Unknown Police Officer #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles v. Unknown Doctor et al
as 6:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Gordon Charles
Defendant:
Unknown Doctor, unknown nurse and Medical provider Orlando County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Calhoun Police Dept. et al
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garza
Defendant:
Calhoun Police Dept. and Arresting Officers Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kendrick Lovett v. Donald Lewis, et al
as 24-10838
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK DEON LOVETT
Defendant:
DONALD ROBERTS LEWIS, STEPHEN E. TONER and UNKNOWN
Edelio Gonzalez-Perez v. Cruz, et al
as 24-10519
Plaintiff:
EDELIO GONZALEZ-PEREZ
Defendant:
CRUZ, WARDEN, UNKNOWN K-9 OFFICER and others
Davis v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
