Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 219
USMAN v. SELLERS
as 5:2019cv00028
Respondent: Eric Sellers
Not Yet Classified: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner: JORDAN C USMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USMAN v. SELLERS
as 2:2019cv00055
Respondent: Eric Sellers and Timothy C. Ward
Not Yet Classified: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner: JORDAN C USMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILSON, et al v. SELLERS
as 5:2019cv00118
Plaintiff: EUGENE WILSON, II, JOHNNIE DURDEN, HASKELL JOHNSON and others
Defendant: WARDEN SELLERS and WARDEN ERIC SELLERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USMAN v. SELLERS
as 5:2019cv00084
Respondent: WARDEN ERIC SELLERS
Petitioner: JORDAN C USMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOOD v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2019cv00041
Defendant: Andrews, Wolcots, CHARLES WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff: BRANDON CRAIG WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waugh v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv20038
Defendant: Rick Scott, Seller, Chaplain Bascom Smith and others
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Waugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00003
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Wood v. Sellers et al
as 1:2018cv05662
Plaintiff: Brandon Craig Wood
Defendant: Charles Williams, Georgia Diagnostics and Classification Prison, Quinton Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLOUNT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2018cv00441
Plaintiff: RICKY BLOUNT
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAILROOM STAFF, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYWARD v. TOBY et al
as 5:2018cv00357
Defendant: ANNETTE TOBY, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CANNON, REGIONAL DIRECTOR ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff: BENNY HAYWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?