Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Allen v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01232
Plaintiff:
Belinda Allen
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01231
Plaintiff:
Tokyo Gatson
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01236
Plaintiff:
Pete Hanks
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikell v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01234
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mikell
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson et al v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01036
Plaintiff:
Tokyo Gatson, Belinda Allen, Daniel Gatson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Henderson v. Virginia Hernandez Covington, et al
as 15-11267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, ANTHONY BISHOP, Appeal from Panama City Division, Pensacola Div., Tallahassee Div., Early County Superior Court, Baldwin County Superior Court, Chahooga County Superior Court, Michigan Eastern District, St. Louis Dublin Div., Statesborough Savannah 11th C, JOSE MORALES, Johnson State Prison and others
Glenn v. Danforth
as 1:2013cv00118
Petitioner:
Early Glenn
Respondent:
William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Early v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00337
Petitioner:
James Lee Early
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SCOTT v. MCNEIL
as 4:2010cv00571
Plaintiff:
JIMMY JONES SCOTT, SR
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL, DUFFIE HARRISON, DARRELL VALENTINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
