Cases 31 - 40 of 719
Michael Gorbey v. Harr, et al
as 23-12960
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
HARR, J. SPELL, COTTEL and others
Ramirez-Gonzalez v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv01103
Petitioner:
Izamary Esmerald Ramirez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rigoberto Fernandez-Gonzalez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 23-12938
Petitioner / Appellant:
RIGOBERTO FERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
BLAKE v. SAMMIS et al
as 3:2023cv21819
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEONOUR BLAKE
Defendant:
SAMMIS, M LOWE, CATNOCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2023cv00486
Petitioner:
Domingo Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez v. United State of America
as 0:2023cv61449
Plaintiff:
Roberto Alexander Gonzalez
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gorbey v. Harr et al
as 5:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
FNU Harr, J. Spell, FNU Cottel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gonzalez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2023cv01579
Petitioner:
Miguel Gonzalez
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00351
Petitioner:
Gilberto Gonzalez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jorge Gonzalez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12276
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE A. GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
