Cases 31 - 40 of 440
Jeffrey Lagrandeur v. A. Najjar, et al
as 22-13797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR
Defendant / Appellee:
A. NAJJAR, Correction Officer, N. OLVERA, Sergeant Corrections, J.S. ROBERTS, Sergeant Correction Officer and others
GRANT v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
DAYVON GRANT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEREK HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lagrandeur v. Najjar et al
as 2:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lagrandeur
Defendant:
A. Najjar, N. Olvera, J.S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Burke
as 4:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. Grant
Defendant:
Dr. Charles Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv02344
Petitioner:
Quinetta Grant
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grant v. Dixon et al (Calhoun County)
as 8:2022cv01253
Plaintiff:
Hewitt A. Grant, II
Defendant:
Thomas Dixon, Ricky Anderson, Douglas Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Ward et al
as 4:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Dayvon A. Grant
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Robert Toole, Kevin Sprayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrestouilh v. Adams County Webex Courts et al
as 8:2022cv00800
Plaintiff:
Raymond Arrestouilh
Defendant:
Adams County Webex Courts, Arapahoe County Jail and Wells Fargo Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANT v. TOBY et al
as 5:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
DAYVON GRANT
Defendant:
WARDEB ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN DEREK HILL, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Cobb v. USA
as 22-10824
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY GRANT COBB
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
