Cases 31 - 40 of 291
HAYES v. MCLENDON
as 1:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
ANDRE HAYES
Respondent:
TRE MCLENDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burge v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Burge
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, LLC, MHM Health Professionals, LLC, Jose R. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spahr v. Davis et al
as 5:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Steven Charles Spahr
Defendant:
FNU Davis, FNU Lancaster, FNU Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christensen v. Bowden et al
as 3:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Dennis Christensen
Defendant:
T. Bowden, C. Underhill, Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Scowden et al
as 2:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Scowden, C. Redford, K. Tisdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson et al v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Rodrick L. Richardson, Charles Low, Walter Christian and others
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Superior Courts, Georgia Public Defender Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTON v. HAIR et al
as 3:2022cv06325
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS K BURTON
Defendant:
HAIR, WADE, HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. TSG Commissary
as 8:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Hayes
Defendant:
TSG Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DICKS et al
as 4:2022cv00130
Petitioner:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Respondent:
T. DICKS, Y. L. LEWIS, E. NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burge v. Dixon et al
as 5:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Burge
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Centurion of Florida, MHM Health Professionals LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
