Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Augustus Lundy v. Warden, et al
as 11-14966
Petitioner - Appellant:
AUGUSTUS LARRY LUNDY
Respondent - Appellee:
BILLY MITCHEM, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and WARDEN
Lundy v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv21031
Plaintiff:
Norris Lundy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lundy v. Moore et al
as 5:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Myles E. Lundy
Defendant:
Deborah Jean Moore , Peggy Ann Cooper , Esmail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Madan et al
as 3:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Elio Madan, P Gudino, Victor Selyutin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2011cv00018
Petitioner:
Rodney Mitchell Lundy
Respondent:
Alabama Dept. of Corrections and J. C. Giles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lundy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00155
Petitioner:
John H. Lundy and John H. Lundy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lundy v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2010cv00357
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Augustus Larry Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Franklin Woody v. Steve Cronic, et al
as 10-10571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS FRANKLIN WOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE CRONIC, LT. SEYMORE, SGT. UNDERWOOD and others
Bruno-Lundy v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv20363
Plaintiff:
Marleine Bruno-Lundy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Taylor v. Green et al
as 2:2007cv00383
Plaintiff:
Willie . Taylor
Defendant:
Arthur Green, Lundy and Fairfield, City of, Alabama Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
