Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Nguyen v. Daniels et al
as 2:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Nguyen
Defendant:
F.N.U. Daniels, F.N.U. Owensby, F.N.U. Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NGUYEN v. MCNEIL
as 3:2010cv00107
Petitioner:
JULIAN NGUYEN
Respondent:
WALTER MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byrd v. Rice et al
as 3:2010cv00232
Plaintiff:
Michael Byrd
Defendant:
Ronald J. Rice, L. Hoang, Hiep Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chacon v. Rice et al
as 3:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jose Lucio Chacon
Defendant:
Ron Rice and Hiep Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore Sorrells, III v. Steven Singer, et al
as 10-10677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELMORE SORRELLS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN SINGER, Warden Florida State Prison, HIEP NGUYEN, Chief Health Officer Columbia Correctional Institution, ANDERSON, Assistant Warden, Columbia Correctional Institution and others
Carpentier v. Davis et al
as 3:2009cv01241
Plaintiff:
Keith Richard Carpentier
Defendant:
James Davis, Derek P. Gibstien, Michael Wiggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv01200
Plaintiff:
Hien Van Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sinnett v. Johnson et al
as 3:2009cv01159
Plaintiff:
David Lee Sinnett
Defendant:
John Doe Johnson, John Doe, 1, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrells v. Singer et al
as 3:2009cv01057
Plaintiff:
Elmore Sorrells, III
Defendant:
Steven Singer, Hiep Nguyen, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caison v. Reddish et al
as 3:2009cv01025
Plaintiff:
Norman E. Caison
Defendant:
B. Reddish, S. T. Robinson, Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
