Cases 31 - 40 of 5,075
THOMPSON v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC, JASON THOMAS BRENES CATINCHI and JAQUELINE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Johnson v. Kevin Marler
as 24-11060
Plaintiff:
RICKY J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR, CCA, SHARON LEWIS, THOMAS FERRELL and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Alvarez-Cuan v. Warden Thomas
as 1:2024cv01501
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Alvarez-Cuan
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coggins v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Corey Blaine Coggins
Respondent:
Michael Thomas
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Beadle
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Faye Beadle, R. Houston and Captain Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. BUTTS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
JORDAN WATSON and JORDAN A WATSON
Respondent:
BUTTS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, THOMAS H WILSON, MICHAEL PARISH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams, Daniel v. Forman et al
as 0:2024cv60518
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Adams
Defendant:
Brenda D. Forman and Office of the Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. USA
as 3:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
JOHN M THOMAS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas Vaughn v. USA
as 24-10850
Petitioner:
THOMAS ALLEN VAUGHN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
