Cases 41 - 50 of 643
Moore v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01063
Petitioner:
Justin M. Moore
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pye v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
William James Pye
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr, State Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Warden, FCI Jesup Prison
as 2:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Quinton Lamont Oliver
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Switzer v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01018
Petitioner:
Steven Switzer
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
Williams v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Curtis Andrew Williams
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Tyrone Oliver, Michael W. Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birks v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Bobby D. Birks, Jr.
Respondent:
Shawn Gillis and Tyrone Oliver
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Henry Oliver McKinnon, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver Williams v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10479
Petitioner:
OLIVER D. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Heard v. Chambers et al
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Brandon Xavier Heard
Defendant:
Warden Chambers, Deputy Warden Prosser, ADA Warden Messer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
