Cases 41 - 50 of 724
Corpus v. Yen et al
as 2:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Doctor Le Yen and Ms. Gardener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HREJN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
HARLEY HREJN, DREW RAYNE and DAVID ANDREW TENNANT
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. USA
as 3:2023cv00798
Petitioner:
Ronald Andrews
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Estinfil v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv10050
Plaintiff:
Whendid Estinfil
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Miami-Dade County, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
England v. Dudley et al
as 8:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Christopher England
Defendant:
Christopher Dudley, Clayton Andrew Coquyt, Samantha A. Skidmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Brown
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suh v. Dept of Justice
as 6:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Andrew Suh
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaston v. Lake County et al
as 5:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Angel E. Gaston
Defendant:
Florida Lake County, Peyton C. Grinnell, Gary J. Cooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
SAPP v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
ANDREW A SAPP
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and HIGHLAND COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
