Cases 41 - 50 of 75
James Pesci v. Tim Budz, et al
as 18-10642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. PESCI
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM BUDZ, individually and in his official capacity as former Facility Administrator of FCCC, THE GEO GROUP, INC., CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Beck v. Gwinnett County Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv02802
Plaintiff:
Jordan Lee Beck
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Detention Center, Butch Conway, Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Redd v. Jeffrey Mann, et al
as 17-13271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY REDD
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY MANN and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Simmer v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2017cv22581
Plaintiff:
Wesley D. Simmer
Defendant:
Y. Stoker, Liu Mengmin, S. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2017cv14248
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Leonard
Defendant:
State of Florida, Secretary Department of Corrections, Lars Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaver v. Whitehead et al
as 1:2017cv02531
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Beaver, Jr.
Defendant:
Whitehead and Correct Care Solutions Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2017cv00745
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Leonard
Defendant:
State of Florida, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Lars Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. MIDDLEBROOKS et al
as 3:2017cv00314
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T MURPHY
Defendant:
SCOTT MIDDLEBROOKS, CHARLES MAIORANA, ANDRES MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. GEO GROUP INC, et al
as 5:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, G POYTHRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redd v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv01325
Plaintiff:
Terry Redd
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann and Correct Care Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
