Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Navarrete - Montanez v. The United States Atty Grl of The US et al
as 3:2014cv00022
Petitioner:
Guillermo DeJesus Navarrete-Montana
Respondent:
The United States Atty Grl of The US, Secretary of State of The US, Michelle Lynn Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEJESUS v. MEDLIN
as 3:2014cv00022
Petitioner:
NAVARETTE DEJESUS
Respondent:
JASON D MEDLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Osorio v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv14418
Petitioner:
Candido DeJesus Osorio
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HUDSON v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
BAYON DEJESUS HUDSON
Defendant:
KEVIN DAVIS, FOWLER, CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJeus v. Crews et al
as 0:2013cv60431
Petitioner:
Enoch DeJesus
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews and The Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acuna-Acosta v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv23924
Plaintiff:
Manuel DeJesus Acuna-Acosta
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Francisco DeJesus v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 12-11501
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCISCO DEJESUS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
DEJESUS v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO DEJESUS
Defendant:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, US SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, BASTELL INSURANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Chapa v. USA
as 11-13722
Petitioner - Appellant:
IVAN DEJESUS CHAPA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DeJesus v. Gwinnett County Detention Center
as 1:2011cv01573
Plaintiff:
Francisco J. DeJesus
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
