Cases 41 - 50 of 625
Christopher Glenn v. USA
as 23-10888
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. GLENN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ASBERRY v. KEMP et al
as 1:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ASBERRY
Defendant:
GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP, WARDEN AARON PINEIRO, DWS P GLENN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAZILL v. BRANNON et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL R BRAZILL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R BRANNON, JONATHAN JONES, GLENN E HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. PINERIO et al
as 4:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pernell Butler
Defendant:
Aaron Pinerio, WARDEN Phillip Glenn, WARDEN Briana Kaigle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASBERRY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER et al
as 5:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ASBERRY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER, ROBERT TOOLE, JACK RANDALL SAULS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. PINERIO et al
as 5:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
DARRYL PERNELL BUTLER
Defendant:
WARDEN AARON PINERIO, WARDEN PHILLIP GLENN, WARDEN BRIANA KAIGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn Bruton v. Warden, et al
as 23-10498
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLENN BRUTON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Underwood v. Campbell et al
as 9:2023cv80245
Plaintiff:
William Floyd Underwood
Defendant:
Glenn Campbell and Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. ADAMS
as 1:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
NORMAN O GLENN
Respondent:
WARDEN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stoney Glenn v. Tona, et al
as 23-10261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STONEY GLENN
Defendant / Appellee:
TONA and CARTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
