Cases 41 - 50 of 463
Wallace Collier v. Woodrow Myers, et al
as 22-11188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE GARY COLLIER, a.k.a. Gary Winters
Defendant / Appellee:
WOODROW A. MYERS, COO Corizon and CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES
Scott v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Christine Scott
Defendant:
State of Florida, Sheriff Steve Whidden, Cheif Thomas Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardin v. Cruz et al
as 3:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hardin
Defendant:
Dr. Cruz, Ricky Dixon, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
MARK S DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN MYERS, DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIE MOBLEY, CAPT ZIRKLE RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STARLING v. MYERS
as 4:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
ALFRED STARLING
Respondent:
WARDEN DARRIN MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIXON v. MYERS
as 4:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
BERNARD DIXON
Respondent:
Darren Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIXON v. MYERS
as 5:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
BERNARD DIXON
Respondent:
WARDEN DARREN MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ware v. Myers
as 4:2022cv00001
Petitioner:
Jarvis A. Ware
Respondent:
Warden D. Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STARLING v. MYERS
as 1:2021cv00229
Petitioner:
ALFRED STARLING
Respondent:
WARDEN DARRIN MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green et al v. Screven County Commissioners Office et al
as 6:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kenya Roshay Green and Any Persons Housed & Arrested by the Screven County Sheriff's Department between -
Defendant:
Screven County Commissioners Office, Screven County Sheriffs Department, Sheriff Mike Kile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
