Cases 51 - 60 of 601
Woods v. Ofc. Pinell et al
as 3:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Ofc. Pinell and Suwannee C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Suwannee C.I. Administration et al
as 3:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Dannis G. Woods and Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Suwannee C.I. Administration, Ofc. Penhill, Dr. Islam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Suwannee C.I. Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Suwannee C.I. Staff, ADA, Doctors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Shawn Emmons, Joshua Jones and Jeffery Balled
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. Terry et al
as 3:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Ashley Terry, Michelle Cook, Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Columbia C.I. et al
as 3:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Columbia C.I., Medical, Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. State of Florida
as 3:2023cv00391
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Shawn Emmons, Staff Security and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Columbia Main/Annex Administration Unit et al
as 3:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Columbia Main/Annex Administration Unit, Medical, Mental Health Classification, Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Warden
as 4:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
