Cases 51 - 60 of 390
Godhigh v. Softness et al
as 3:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
Melissa Ivy Softness, Jose Paz, Gilberto Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Perez et al
as 3:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
Gilberto Perez, Jair Butron, Jose Paz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Paz et al
as 3:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
Jose Paz, Gilberto Perez, George Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Hames et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Petitioner:
Nadya Ivette Diaz
Respondent:
Adam Hames, Matthew Kyle Winchester, United States District Court ND GA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Diaz v. Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2022cv02221
Petitioner:
Camilo Diaz, Jr.
Respondent:
Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diaz v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
Luis A. Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez-Diaz v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
Jair Eudoro Ramirez-Diaz
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rushing v. Salaman et al
as 8:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Carla L. Rushing
Defendant:
Krystal Salaman, Ashley Blue, Douglas Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
