Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Sears v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00561
Plaintiff:
Terry E. Sears
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, C. Douglas, FNU Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graton v. Doe et al
as 7:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Michael Jay Graton
Defendant:
John Doe, I, Doctor Moody, Jane Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggins v. Beseler et al
as 3:2009cv00548
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Riggins
Defendant:
Rick Beseler, Jr., Lt. Keenan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlicher v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00489
Plaintiff:
Gregory H. Schlicher
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Page A. Smith, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlicher v. McNeal et al
as 3:2009cv00381
Plaintiff:
Gregory H. Schlicher
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeal, Page A. Smith, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Jackson et al
as 1:2009cv01074
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
Ted Jackson, Fulton County, Riley Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTLEY v. ELLIS
as 3:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
DREW C HARTLEY
Defendant:
D ELLIS, D LEDKINS, JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Erickson v. Jeter et al
as 6:2008cv01695
Plaintiff:
Erick James Erickson
Defendant:
Susan Jeter, Ned Mills, Jason Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2008cv01988
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Police Department, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Loizzo et al
as 1:2008cv20181
Plaintiff:
Eugene E Mack
Defendant:
Linda Loizzo, A.G Lewis, DS Foglegren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
