Cases 61 - 70 of 137
Curtis v. Trump et al
as 8:2017cv02345
Plaintiff:
Alan Boyd Curtis
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bermudez-Franco v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv23076
Plaintiff:
Maria V. Bermudez-Franco
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GONZALEZ-LAUZAN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 5:2017cv00158
Petitioner:
LUIS R GONZALEZ-LAUZAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McClain et al v. Pinckneyville Segregation et al
as 2:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
China Anne McClain, Johnnie Garrett and Sienna McClain
Defendant:
Pinckneyville Segregation, Personal Property, Offender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. United States Department of Justice (BOP)
as 1:2017cv01342
Petitioner:
Richard L. Moore
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Louis v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2017cv21093
Plaintiff:
David Louis
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Scott et al
as 6:2017cv00521
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
J.D. Scott, Mr. Gibbs, Merit System Protection Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elysee v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv21051
Plaintiff:
Francis Elysee
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv21052
Plaintiff:
Lacroix Emannuel James
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
