Cases 71 - 80 of 772
Marcus Kelly v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 22-12588
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS KELLY
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Deforest Kelly v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12559
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEFOREST L. KELLY
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Sapp v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Sheriff Alfonzo Williams, Jason Vinson, James Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mobley v. Kelly et al
as 1:2022cv22165
Plaintiff:
Raqwan Mobley
Defendant:
M. Kelly, Ruben Williams, Stephen Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrington v. Harper et al
as 5:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Tavares L. Farrington
Defendant:
Officer Harper, Lieutenant Cordero, Lieutenant Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Timothy Eugene Kelly v. USA
as 22-12291
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY EUGENE KELLY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Farrington v. Harper et al
as 5:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Tavares L. Farrington
Defendant:
Officer Harper, D.H.O. Carol, Assistant Warden Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kallman v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 5:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Tracy Kallman
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, A Canan, D. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KALLMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
TRACY KALLMAN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, A CANAN and D KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Galdamez et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Detective Jose Galdamez, Attorney Dante Hudson, District Attorney Stephen D. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
