Cases 71 - 80 of 1,549
Qaasim v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Saleel Z. Qaasim
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Saint-Fleur v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00171
Petitioner:
Franck Saint-Fleur
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Valentinis-Dee v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 5:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
James Valentinis-Dee
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown-El v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Brown-El
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gill v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden, FCC Coleman, Warden, USP Hazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
King v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP II
as 5:2023cv00087
Petitioner:
Cedric King
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Joe Russell, Jr. v. USP Atlanta Warden
as 23-10330
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOE B. RUSSELL, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
USP ATLANTA WARDEN
Marshall Williams v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-10275
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Augusme v. Warden, Pollock USP
as 0:2023cv60111
Plaintiff:
Louisson Augusme
Defendant:
Warden, Pollock USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Knutson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Todd Seaver Knutson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
