Cases 71 - 80 of 39,785
Adan v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02432
Petitioner:
Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dent v. Adams
as 1:2024cv02453
Petitioner:
Terrance Dent
Respondent:
Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes v. G.S.P Georgia State Patrol et al
as 1:2024cv02454
Plaintiff:
Andre Lemar Rhodes
Defendant:
G.S.P Georgia State Patrol, G.S.P Officers and Officer Swain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Adams et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Defendant:
Ms. Rylee, Brian Adams, McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Defendant:
Smith State Prison, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Defendant:
Smith State Prison, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TILLMAN v. USA
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
MARQUAVION TILLMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PARKER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
VRAIMONE GERMAINE PARKER
Defendant:
JOE WILLIAMS and GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC & CLASSIFICATION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swope v. USA
as 1:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
Lakisha Swope
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diarra v. Biden
as 1:2024cv02429
Petitioner:
Moussa U'nra Diarra
Respondent:
U. S. President Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
