Cases 71 - 80 of 39,798
Smith v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv02514
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOORE v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
MARCUS MOORE
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gobert v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Michael James Gobert
Respondent:
Warden James Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carson v. Pounds et al
as 1:2024cv02488
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allyn Carson
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Pounds, Head Nurse Germany and Douglas Count Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
COUNSELOR RAULS, JOHN DOE, COII SHAKRISTY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Spalding County Law Authorities
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Charles Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Spalding County Law Authorities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKMAN v. KASPER
as 1:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Graham Jackman
Respondent:
JEANIE KASPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
