Cases 1 - 10 of 77,638
Spivack, Jeffrey v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv80748
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Spivack
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
United States of America
as 1:2024cv22321
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Martinez
as 0:2024cv61037
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockhart, Roderick v. State of Florida
as 0:2024cv61026
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Lockhart
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Orange County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Paris Demetrius Evans
Defendant:
James McCann, Debra Lassus, Patricia Wubket and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. SWAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WALLACE BRYANT
Defendant:
SWAIN, KENNEDY, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORN v. WELLS et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III
Defendant:
KEVIN WELLS, BILL EDDINS, TERRY TERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00298
Petitioner:
Robert Lewis Morgan
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nicholas v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Joshua David Nicholas
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hightower v. McGillin, Jr. et al
as 3:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Hightower, Jr.
Defendant:
Howard O. McGillin, Jr., Seventh Judicial Circuit and Putnam County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
