Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Phillips v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Rodney Nigel Phillips, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Florida, Public Defender Regina Emile, Adam Rosenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
RODNEY NIGEL PHILLIPS JR and RODNEY NIGEL PHILLIPS, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, REGINA EMILE, ADAM ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSENBERGER v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT
as 3:2022cv00115
Petitioner:
DESTINY DELANA ROSENBERGER
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KAUFMAN v. JACKSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 5:2019cv00463
Defendant:
KEITH BAILEY, JEETER, ROSENBERG and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE JAMES KAUFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorman v. Coral Springs Police Department et al
as 0:2019cv62735
Plaintiff:
Bradley Dorman
Defendant:
Palm Beach Sheriffs Office, Nicholas Mazzei, Coral Springs Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorman v. Rosenberg et al
as 9:2019cv80025
Plaintiff:
Bradley Dorman
Defendant:
Xavier Reinoso, Ken Johnson, Brian Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Donovan v. Glazier et al
as 4:2018cv00147
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Donovan
Defendant:
Nellie Glazier and Cory Rosenberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-15271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Roche Bail Bonds, Corporation et al
as 8:2016cv00301
Plaintiff:
James M. Smith
Defendant:
Roche Bail Bonds, Corporation and Bobby Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
