Cases 1 - 10 of 1,770
Yi v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv02645
Plaintiff:
Chu Young Yi
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Laurente E. Smink and Correct Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. McNeal et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Franklin
Defendant:
Officer McNeal, Officer Best, Officer Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. GEORGIA
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
ZACHARY BOUVIER TAYLOR
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eaker v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taylor Eaker
Defendant:
Nicholas Scott Henderson, William Ben Johnson and Nathan Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv02361
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Carson
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. KELMON et al
as 5:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN KELMON, WARDEN MACFALEN, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLAYTON v. WARD
as 5:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGE IVEY, STG EDWARD FLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dai-Juan Taylor v. Fulton County District Attorney, et al
as 24-11513
Plaintiff:
DAI-JUAN TAIKAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
FULTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, POLICE CHIEF OF FAIRBURN, GA, FAIRBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Wilborn v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01985
Plaintiff:
William R. Wilborn
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Jason Young and Naylor Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor, Daryl v. Dade Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv21651
Plaintiff:
Daryl Taylor
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
