Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clark v. Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv05595
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Clark
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department, Kebo Taylor, J. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Medical et al
as 3:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Medical, Mental Health, Classification and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Secretary, ADM et al
as 3:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Secretary, ADM, Ofc. Sgt. Bloom, Ofc. Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Suwannee C.I. Administration et al
as 3:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Dannis G. Woods and Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Suwannee C.I. Administration, Ofc. Penhill, Dr. Islam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Suwannee C.I. et al
as 3:2016cv01463
Plaintiff:
Dannis Conrol Woods
Defendant:
Suwannee C.I., Doctor S.D. Limm, Doctor Mera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Suddaby et al
as 1:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
G. Suddaby, Tohenberg, William Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv04005
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Moore, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 15-12907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW MOORE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN and MEDICAL ADM. DIZON
Moore v. Keller et al
as 1:2014cv03141
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Keller and Medical Adm. Dizon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cornell Brumfield v. GEO World, Inc., et al
as 10-13575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELL BRUMFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO WORLD, INC., also known as Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility, BARNETT, M.D., BAYERS, Medical Adm. RADDF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
