Cases 1 - 10 of 89
WALKER v. PATE
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
AMOS WALKER
Defendant:
PATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Harold Ray Amos
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Southall v. Hall
as 2:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Amos Southall
Respondent:
Phil Hall
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bien-Aime v. Wellpath Health Services et al
as 9:2023cv81470
Plaintiff:
Amos Bien-Aime
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services, Dr. Charles Dack and Dr. Cardelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv14423
Plaintiff:
Amos J. Moss
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Clark v. Gordon County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Keith Amos Clark
Defendant:
Gordon County Jail and Mitch Raulston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOWDEN v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2022cv09370
Plaintiff:
AMOS SNOWDEN
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL, JEFF BERGOSH, WILLIAM RICH POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinder v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00297
Petitioner:
Amos Timothy Pinder
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUBBARD v. LEE et al
as 5:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
AMOS HUBBARD
Defendant:
MAJOR A C LEE, CAPTAIN OBERSE, SERGEANT JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baskin v. Fedler et al
as 5:2021cv00433
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Baskin
Defendant:
M. Fedler, FNU Beneter, C. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
