Cases 1 - 10 of 154
BRYANT v. KIRKLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
BUSTER BRYANT
Defendant:
AARON A KIRKLAND, PATTON and ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raytaurus Armstrong v. Florida Attorney General, et al
as 24-10698
Petitioner:
RAYTAURUS EMON ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Morgan Armstrong v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10603
Petitioner:
MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON, et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, NURSE ARMSTRONG and NURSE ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONCEPCION-PADILLA v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 5:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CONCEPCION-PADILLA
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG, RUBEN MORILLO, VIRGINIA LUCKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeSean Baskin v. Sheriff, Fulton County Georgia, et al
as 23-14045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESEAN M. BASKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF, FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA, NAPHCARE, INC., HAYES-ARMSTRONG and others
DeSean Baskin v. Sheriff, Fulton County Georgia, et al
as 23-14043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESEAN M. BASKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK LABOTT, HAYES-ARMSTRONG, SAINT-SIREN and others
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, ARMSTRONG and ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Dooly State Prison et al
as 4:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Erik E. Pryor
Defendant:
Dooly State Prison, Ms. Armstrong and Ms. Altma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. WEBB et al
as 3:2023cv24696
Plaintiff:
JAVONEY DEVON ROBERTS
Defendant:
JAMES R WEBB, C SIMMONS and T ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
