Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Beckham v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv01719
Plaintiff:
Gerald Anthony Beckham
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail and Naphcare Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckham v. State of Florida et al
as 6:2018cv00452
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Van Beckham
Defendant:
State of Florida and Melbourne Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. BLACKWELL et al
as 5:2016cv00522
Plaintiff:
SAMSON EUGENE JAMES
Defendant:
MAXINE BLACKWELL, WILLIE KNIGHT, JOINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. LASALLE CORRECTIONS et al
as 7:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
TRAVONE JORDAN
Defendant:
LASALLE CORRECTIONS, IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, BECKHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENSON v. LASALLE CORRECTIONS et al
as 7:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CHALYSE BENSON
Defendant:
LASALLE CORRECTIONS, IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, IRWIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMSON v. LASALLE CORRECTIONS et al
as 7:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
CHAD ALLEN WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
LASALLE CORRECTIONS, IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, IRWIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORBES vs HOUSTON COUNTY DETENTIN CENTER et al
as 5:2015cv00306
Plaintiff:
CLINTON A FORBES
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE and KIMBERLY BECKHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. BECKHAM et al
as 5:2015cv00298
Plaintiff:
ISSAC KING, JR
Defendant:
KIMBERLY BECKHAM, SCM SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE and RRANSERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. United States of America et al
as 5:2007cv00469
Plaintiff:
Leon Beckham Redmond
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Carlyle I. Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
