Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Hubbert v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv14272
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Hubbert
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Ms. Barron, Mr. Kenny Brinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood v. Barron
as 5:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Sergio Antonio Hood
Defendant:
Officer Barron and FNU Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hood v. Barron
as 8:2023cv01524
Petitioner:
Sergio Antonio Hood
Defendant:
Officer Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Williams v. Troup Co. Sheriff Dept et al
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Cartavious Williams
Defendant:
Troup Co. Sheriff Dept, Officer Moore, Cpl Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barron v. Farabee et al
as 1:2022cv03265
Plaintiff:
Ricky Eugene Barron
Defendant:
Cliff Farabee, Sheriff Don E. Thurman and Chris Colby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barron-Salazar v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Manatee County)
as 8:2022cv01121
Petitioner:
Juan Roberto Barron-Salazar
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2022cv04296
Plaintiff:
BARRON ANDERSON
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holston v. English et al
as 2:2020cv14421
Defendant:
Sergeant Sellers, Nurse Romulus, A. Eschevarria and others
Plaintiff:
Reginal L. Holston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
