Cases 1 - 10 of 75
AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 5:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AMMONS, IV
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and BIBB COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DANTE SMITH
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AMMONS, IV
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, JUDGE HOWARD Z SIMMS and ADA DOROTHY V HULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. LONG
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
GLEN SPEARING MATTHEWS
Defendant:
ROBERT R LONG, HARRY J FOX, JR, JOHN FRANCISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
CODY ROBERTS
Defendant:
JAY ROBERTS and BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNYDER v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
ERIC EUGENE SNYDER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVIS DAVIS, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, BORIUDIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Macon Bibb County LEC
as 1:2021cv03006
Plaintiff:
Tyerone Davon Stephens
Defendant:
Macon Bibb County LEC, Officer Story and Officer Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROOKS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 5:2021cv00004
Defendant:
DEFENSE ATTORNEY LARRY FOUCHE, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS v. MACON BIBB COUNTY LEC
as 5:2020cv00224
Defendant:
MACON BIBB COUNTY LEC
Plaintiff:
TYERONE DAVON STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
