Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Franklin v. McNeal et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Franklin
Defendant:
Officer McNeal, Officer Best, Officer Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGS v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
DAVIS, BRICE GOOGLE, D WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 3:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MONROE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAPTAIN PECORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Henry et al
as 6:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Ramone Dayne Robinson
Defendant:
Duane Henry, Kadean Wilson, Trevor Persenaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conerly v. Boggs et al
as 5:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Adam James Conerly
Defendant:
Tommy Boggs, Lutrina Jones and Dr. Carvallo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verdun v. Smith et al
as 8:2021cv02370
Plaintiff:
Bruce Alan Verdun, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael P. Smith, Brian Morland, Rebecca Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edson Gelin v. Emmett Boggs, Jr., et al
as 23-10565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant / Appellee:
EMMETT JACKSON BOGGS, JR. and MICHAEL A. DRAKE
Boggs v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Boggs
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Godwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gelin v. Boggs et al
as 6:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
Edson Gelin
Defendant:
Emmett Jackson Boggs, Jr. and Michael A. Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Carr et al
as 1:2021cv02799
Plaintiff:
Zekemian Tyrone Davis
Defendant:
Michael Carr, Andy Pascuals, Daniel M. Coursey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
